TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Antenna OT

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Antenna OT
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:24:35 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Strange how hams like to name antennas. And strange how many hams are stuck on the notion that if it is a nice 50 ohm load it is a good antenna.

A German ham (he's on the Ten-Tec reflector or the Eagle reflector), DJ5IL,
has pattended a "Shortened End-Fed Dipole".

If it is end fed, then it is NOT a dipole! It might use one end of the dipole as a feed line, and feed it near the center and then be a dipole. In that case it is not end fed.

This is significant, because:
*       It needs NO RADIALS
*       Being a half wavelength long (electrically), it is completely ground
independent. You won't have ground losses due to not enough radials. *
Sorry this is a fantasy. Any antenna near the ground (meaning within a wavelength or so) will induce some currents in the ground, and have ground losses. If the high current portion of the antenna is less than a quarter wavelength above ground the ground losses are probably significant, unless the ground is a salt marsh or a good radial field. Sure you can make a vertical with no radials, that has a low SWR when fed with 50 ohm (or other) coax. Low SWR does not necessarily mean low loss.

DE N6KB

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>