TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] radios and spectral purity

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] radios and spectral purity
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 07:24:24 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
No, you didn't miss anything, except "antenna" should be listed as "a", not
"b".   hi

Jim, you must be a politician!  ;=)

73
Rick, DJ0IP

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Jim Lowman
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:47 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] radios and spectral purity

As men, there are a few unwritten laws:

Don't denigrate another man's woman.
Don't denigrate another man's ride.

If a ham, don't denigrate choice of:
     a)  radio
     b)  antenna
     c)  chosen mode(s) of operation

Did I miss anything?

73 de Jim - AD6CW

On 5/14/2012 6:48 PM, Richards wrote:
> Wow...  that is good to know.    I will pass that along.
>
>               ... AND... be prepared to DUCK !
>
> [You know how some guys get when you say something about their rig... ]
>
> ;-)
>
> ================  K8JHR  =======================
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>