TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation
From: "Randy Moore" <ai4co@embarqmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:35:09 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I also took Jim's email the way that most others did.  I would like to
mention that since email is a written form of communication/expression that
sometimes your message is misunderstood. The emotion and body language are
missing from email so the state of emotion of the writer is not always
decoded properly.

As to Field Day.  Field Day is the reason that I got into amateur radio.  I
visited a local field day operation years ago and was hooked. I spent 24
years in the US Army Signal Corps, and being in the Signal Corps we spent
two weeks out of every four in the field providing communications for other
units such as combat and combat support units.  I enjoyed the move to the
field sites, setting up, troubleshooting, etc., but once we were in place
the day to day part was usually quite boring unless we moved to another site
or the exercise area changed. I find Field Day to be the same.  I like
setting up the site, solving problems and changing antenna and equipment
configurations to be the fun part, and the "contest" part of Field Day to be
less fun.

When I operate Field Day on my own I like to change antenna configurations
and see if I can use locally available materials to make field expedient
antennas.  I treat Field Day as if it is an exercise to operate under
emergency conditions. It would be interesting if there were requirements in
the rules to tear down and move the field site to another location or
simulate a storm that destroyed the antennas and you have to come up with a
field replacement built from the surviving parts.  I realize this actually
happens in some parts of the country when they actually get hit by a storm
during Field Day.

Anyway, I enjoyed field Day this year and hope to participate in many more
of them.

73

AI4CO
Randy Moore


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Richards
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:06 AM
To: k9yc@arrl.net; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation



On 6/26/2012 2:39 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

> So I don't want to hear a lot of crap from guys who don't contribute a 
> thing about how I need to slow down and mentor others. I do that, and 
> I'd bet that I do at least 100 times more of it than those who are 
> giving me the crap.


-----------------------------------------------------------

        Gee, Jim, I don't recall that being the point of
        any criticism... instead... I think the objection
        was more directed to your chastising the Old Fart
        who (perhaps) needlessly repeated his message
        and took longer, and who said more than the bare
        minimum, to complete the Field Day exchange, that
        spawned any criticism.  You sorta came off sounding
        condescending and hyper-critical of anyone who did
        not handle the exchange as would a super efficient,
        highly practiced, world class contester.


        It is unfortunate the ARRL modeled its Field Day
        assessment scheme in the style and fashion of a major
        contest.  That seems to have transformed Field Day
        from a nationwide training exercise into more of
        a contest.

        I understand Field Day to be an invitation to
        ALL HAMS to devote at least one day each year to
        setting up the type of station that might be required
        for a large scale emergency event, and then sharpen
        one's operating skills by making a lot of quick,
        pithy, exchanges - which is, at least, where the
        contest format makes more sense.

        But I also thought Field Day is an invitation to
        ALL HAMS - of whatever stripe, to participate in
        a large scale, nationwide event, both for public
        service, and to promote and publicize the hobby,
        placing it in a good light in the community - sort
        of a radio open house, as it were.

        I also thought hams come in many different stripes,
        and that ham radio is a VERY BIG hobby - big enough to
        accommodate and embrace all sorts of guys - whether they
        are casual rag chewers, highly efficient contestants,
        properly trained Em-Comm volunteers, guys that only
        do phone, or just CW, or both... or even who just do
        digital modes, and even big enough to embrace guys
        who like to operate radios, without knowing how to
        build one,  and so forth.

        So, I think some guys (I did) took your original
        comment to mean slow poke old farts should stay off
        the air on Field Day, if they cannot get with the
        &^%$# program!  It sounded pretty harsh and
        unforgiving.

        In contrast, I thought Field Day was for EVERYONE
        - young, old, fast, slow, experienced, or rookie,
        smart and otherwise.

        I figure if some Old Fart participates in FD from
        his home station, and working CW slowly, at his
        own pace, and repeating himself more than may be
        necessary - TRYING TO BE SURE HE IS COMMUNICATING
        clearly - that he is doing the right thing...
        and he should be accepted on Field Day as just
        as any other guy, who might be a super-fast, super-
        efficient contester type ham, who can make the
        exchange faster than fast.

        So, if Field Day is for everybody... should we
        not take everybody as we find them?   Is there
        not room for the 15 wpm code guy?   Was he really
        all so wrong for repeating his message... slowly...
        trying to make sure it was received correctly
        the first time ?   Should we contact THE BLOKE
        after the event  is over, and tell him he is a lid?
        After all, he probably did not realize you are a
        world class operator, and he may have slowed down
        thinking you must might be a regular guy like he
        is,  and appreciate some slow, but clear, copy.
        Was he really all wrong in how he approached it?

        I think that was the point of any criticism...
        certainly NOT that you are not a good mentor or
        that you don't pull your share of the freight.
        Did that guy really have it so fired wrong ?

        Footnote - in our local traffic nets, they REQUIRE
        the traffic handlers to say apparently unnecessary
        stuff like,  "Please copy..."  and they also REQUIRE
        them torepeat certain heavy portions of the messages,
        so I wonder if the O F thought he was doing it right,
        at least under local conditions...


That is just My take...

Happy Trails and Good DX y'all.

======================  K8JHR  ==========================








.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>