TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation
From: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:39:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I think anyone so put off by the slow operating practices of those on the other end of the path in persuit of a winning score should be required to spend the 24 hours manning the GOTA station working with the visitors and kids to get their 20 contacts. If that won't temper your patience nothing will.

I slowed the process way down on several occasions when I realized the voice on the other end was a KID or a YL that was struggling to make sense of the process and maybe make their first ever over the air contact. Making that a successful experience for them was more important than 100 1 point quickies....

The band conditions were pitiful...6 and 10 were all but dead but somehow we managed to beat last years score while mentoring on both ends of the mic and key.

Cecil
K5DL
MDXA/GDXA (K5MDX) 3A MS
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net> To: <k9yc@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation




On 6/26/2012 2:39 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

So I don't want to hear a lot of crap from guys who don't contribute a
thing about how I need to slow down and mentor others. I do that, and
I'd bet that I do at least 100 times more of it than those who are
giving me the crap.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Gee, Jim, I don't recall that being the point of
any criticism... instead... I think the objection
was more directed to your chastising the Old Fart
who (perhaps) needlessly repeated his message
and took longer, and who said more than the bare
minimum, to complete the Field Day exchange, that
spawned any criticism.  You sorta came off sounding
condescending and hyper-critical of anyone who did
not handle the exchange as would a super efficient,
highly practiced, world class contester.


It is unfortunate the ARRL modeled its Field Day
assessment scheme in the style and fashion of a major
contest.  That seems to have transformed Field Day
from a nationwide training exercise into more of
a contest.

I understand Field Day to be an invitation to
ALL HAMS to devote at least one day each year to
setting up the type of station that might be required
for a large scale emergency event, and then sharpen
one's operating skills by making a lot of quick,
pithy, exchanges - which is, at least, where the
contest format makes more sense.

But I also thought Field Day is an invitation to
ALL HAMS - of whatever stripe, to participate in
a large scale, nationwide event, both for public
service, and to promote and publicize the hobby,
placing it in a good light in the community - sort
of a radio open house, as it were.

I also thought hams come in many different stripes,
and that ham radio is a VERY BIG hobby - big enough to
accommodate and embrace all sorts of guys - whether they
are casual rag chewers, highly efficient contestants,
properly trained Em-Comm volunteers, guys that only
do phone, or just CW, or both... or even who just do
digital modes, and even big enough to embrace guys
who like to operate radios, without knowing how to
build one,  and so forth.

So, I think some guys (I did) took your original
comment to mean slow poke old farts should stay off
the air on Field Day, if they cannot get with the
&^%$# program!  It sounded pretty harsh and
unforgiving.

In contrast, I thought Field Day was for EVERYONE
- young, old, fast, slow, experienced, or rookie,
smart and otherwise.

I figure if some Old Fart participates in FD from
his home station, and working CW slowly, at his
own pace, and repeating himself more than may be
necessary - TRYING TO BE SURE HE IS COMMUNICATING
clearly - that he is doing the right thing...
and he should be accepted on Field Day as just
as any other guy, who might be a super-fast, super-
efficient contester type ham, who can make the
exchange faster than fast.

So, if Field Day is for everybody... should we
not take everybody as we find them?   Is there
not room for the 15 wpm code guy?   Was he really
all so wrong for repeating his message... slowly...
trying to make sure it was received correctly
the first time ?   Should we contact THE BLOKE
after the event  is over, and tell him he is a lid?
After all, he probably did not realize you are a
world class operator, and he may have slowed down
thinking you must might be a regular guy like he
is,  and appreciate some slow, but clear, copy.
Was he really all wrong in how he approached it?

I think that was the point of any criticism...
certainly NOT that you are not a good mentor or
that you don't pull your share of the freight.
Did that guy really have it so fired wrong ?

Footnote - in our local traffic nets, they REQUIRE
the traffic handlers to say apparently unnecessary
stuff like,  "Please copy..."  and they also REQUIRE
them torepeat certain heavy portions of the messages,
so I wonder if the O F thought he was doing it right,
at least under local conditions...


That is just My take...

Happy Trails and Good DX y'all.

======================  K8JHR  ==========================








.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>