TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:08:21 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hot Backup.

One dies, switch to the other and keep on truckin'...

James, for contests it is very important that you standardize.
That makes switching rigs a no brainer.

Outside of contesting, I think most people would rather have a different
kind of transceiver as their second transceiver.

73
Rick, DJ0IP


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Richards
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 7:47 PM
To: nq4i@contesting.com; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2


Good Operator Department:

How would one use multiple rigs of the same model?   I can see why one 
might wanna try a different rig for some reason or other, but why have 
multiple copies of the same model?   How do you operate using multiple 
radios  (other than SO2R contesting) ?

This is a serious question about HOW TO USE our radios - the sort of thing
you don't get from the instruction manual - and can only get get from a
discussion with a more experienced ham, maybe over a tall cold one.


Thanks.
-------------------   K8JHR   -------------------



On 8/9/2012 9:55 AM, nq4i@contesting.com wrote:
> Orion 1 is better for the dollar invested. Get a second Orion 1.  I 
> have ten in my station. Great radio.  Rick NQ4I

______________________________________












x/.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>