TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400

To: "TenTec Reflector" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400
From: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:37:49 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
As I consider the materials required to replace my 30 year old tower, rotor, 
antenna and cables, I have several like new runs on LDF4-50A terminated with 
N-male which could run from my ground window (UHF female) to the top of my 53 
foot tower (60 feet max LDF4-50A cable run)  where a flexible low-loss 10 foot 
jumper would terminate on a new BN-4000 and new TH-7 tribander.  This 
configuration would require the 60 feet max LDF4-50A cable run,  two half inch 
N female to UHF male adapters, one UHF double female and 10 feet of high 
quality RG8 cable as the jumper to the BN-4000.

The alternative which I’m leaning towards as it seems less likely to have 
connector/adapter loss and other potential problems is a single run of 75 feet 
of LMR-400 with factory terminated PL-259s between the BN-4000 and ground 
window UHF female termination. My current installation is 60 feet of RG-9913, a 
UHF double female adapter and a ten foot RG-8214 jumper.

I know the half inch Andrews Heliax has a much lower loss figure (0.357 db per 
100 feet at 30MHz) for a given length versus the same length of LMR 400 (0.7 db 
per 100 feet at 30MHz) , but I’m thinking those three adapters (six connection 
points for loss) and their potential problems make it a wash or maybe the 
advantage goes to the 75 foot run of LMR-400. 

I’d be interested in any comments or experiences you might have on the subject.

73 ES DX,
Gary -- AB9M



 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>