TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] which balun?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] which balun?
From: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:13:40 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 7/27/2013 7:43 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:

Both transformers have their windings wound over the pair of stacked
toroids.  This is bad....It only works as a 4:1 transformer,

A better 4:1 balun is the Balun Designs 4115ocf.
View the picture of the insides of this Balun and see how the cores are
wrapped differently from the 4125.
In this case, each transformer has its own dedicated core, independent of
the other.  THIS ONE WORKS.

____________________________________________________


        Given the problems winding everything on
        a single core - and recognizing using two
        toroids as a single core is STILL USING
        just ONE CORE...

        Would one be be better off having two separate
        devices,  i.e., one to act as a 4:1 impedance
        transformer and another to act as a common
        mode choke?

        If so, might we go one step further and suggest
        it is better to just wind them separately and
        maybe even put a little space between them to
        minimize stray capacitance, inductance, etc?
        Maybe put them in different NEMA boxes, even?

        It seems that would give each device more "room"
        to do its separate job independently of the other
        one.   If that is the case, the only down side
        would be the additional cost of another or a
        larger NEMA box, and maybe a couple extra
        connectors.


Any traction?

===================  K8JHR ===================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>