TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RX-366?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX-366?
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:19:58 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, I saw that. While it's a comforting thing to see, and it seems like it 
should make for a better filter, does it make any practical difference in 
filter performance?

Kim N5OP

"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith

> On Apr 24, 2014, at 10:01, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The Ten-Tec filters are completely enclosed/shielded while the Inrad
> filters are not.
> 
> 73, Barry N1EU
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kim
>> Elmore
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:51 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: [TenTec] RX-366?
>> 
>> I'm considering getting RX-366 with a full set of filters. Which are the
>> better roofing filters: the InRad or the TT filters?
>> 
>> Also, I couldn't find any mention of the RX366 on the TT site. Did I miss a
>> memo?
>> 
>> Kim N5OP
>> 
>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the
>> music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>