TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter on its Way _ A Few Questions
From: ny6p01@gmail.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:39:24 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:29:25PM -0400, K8JHR wrote:
> 
>       
> 
> On 4/27/2014 5:05 PM, ny6p01@gmail.com wrote:
>    Only
> > problem is that I plan on employing it on the same mast with the
> > transmitting antenna. Is that bad practice? The reason is that I am not
> > allowed an outdoor antenna, and I live in a small flat.
> 
> 
> 
>       ER... um... maybe.   Even Wellbrook says one should
>       locate it away from strong transmit antennas to
>       avoid overloading the receiver input.
> 
>       I think the correct answer is that it all depends
>       on how well you isolate the receiver input from
>       the transmit antenna and whether or not you use
>       a separate receiver from the transmit radio, and
>       similar considerations.  SO2R installations have
>       similar issues - sometimes guys use a "front end
>       protector" as is reviewed in QST this month, and
>       other guys use a "time sequencer" to kill the \
>       antenna when transmitting, tied to the PTT line
>       and still others use a separate receive-only
>       antenna input on the rig, as is available on the
>       Omni VII, but not the Eagle.
> 
>       Yep... This COULD be a serious concern if not
>       fully thought out.
>       
> 
>       BUT YOU COULD TRY IT AND SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT
>       AS A RECEIVE ONLY ANTENNA AND DEAL WITH THE
>       TRANSMIT LOGISTICS LATER...

Would a dual position coax switch take care of all this?

Lee
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>