| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc. |
| From: | Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 May 2014 18:18:13 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Yes, that's the upside, Rick. But, I don't trust the FCC if some group with the big money comes along. The only saving grace is that no one wants the HF spectrum. 73 de Jim - AD6CW On 5/22/2014 1:38 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: Jim, I know first impression, that is bad, but the good news is, we have inherited probably a hundred thousand of these guys. They keep the ham statistics up, which gives us a better shot at keeping our spectrum allocation. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks, Phil Sussman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc., Jim Lowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] tenTec merger, etc., Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Emergency Networks, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |