TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR

To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR
From: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:49:03 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
*"I know that in the 1950's Collins did actually use a separate
blanking detection receiver that ran on 9 mhz with its own antenna. I never
used one but it must have been good."*

The KWM-2 blanker ran on 40-MHz.  There was probably too much interference
in the HF region, and low VHF would give better results due to being able
to respond to locally generated noise spikes.

One thing I may have screwed up in my Omni VI is that there is either a SSB
or CW roofing filter in line with the first filter.

Pete
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>