TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Tentec omni V tweak frequency

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Tentec omni V tweak frequency
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:55:39 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Cross the pond?  I thought that happened when you crossed the equator...
 
I'm so confused.  My head hertz..
 
73, ron w3wn


On 03/27/15, Dave Edwards wrote:

But as you cross the pond, it's actually the inverse of that result!
...Dave
On 3/27/15 10:36 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> It's 10 squared times the square root of 1, divided by 100.
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 1:14 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Tentec omni V tweak frequency
>
> Yes, someone PLEASE provide the conversion factor from English kc to Metric
> khz - no wonder all my friends always tell me I'm slightly off frequency
>
> 73, Barry N1EU
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
> wrote:
>
>> ARRL furnished a nomograph to take the confusion out of the conversions.
>> I think I have one around here someplace. Let me know if you
>> need/want to see it.
>>
>> 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 8:45 PM, Paul Gates via TenTec <
>> tentec@contesting.com> wrote:
>>> Amateurs do not use kc any more. We use khz Paul Gates, KW4BD
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:29 AM, Roger Cook via TenTec <
>> tentec@contesting.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a TenTec Omni 5 that is off frequency about the same on all
>> bands. It seems to be off 120 kc.
>>> I have looked at the manual and cannot figure out what needs to be
>> tweaked, If anyone has any info
>>> on this I sure would appreciate it. It has been a great rig for many
>> years and I hope to be able to
>>> correct this.
>>>
>>> KO4O
>>> Roger
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>