*AND* The ARRL has removed the "TOR" (T/R time <=20ms) test for Pactor
and Amtor with very little comment. That was an important and essential
test data point for us CW operators. I am sorry to see it disappear from
their evaluations.
72/73 de Ken N9VV
On 12/10/2015 11:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote:
This harks back to something Rick touched on: Has anyone gone to the
(considerable) trouble to compile what numbers they can about transmitter IMD
performance (at least) and possibly phase noise from ARRL tests? That would be
a long-term task and I think ARRL changed their phase noise test procedure a
while back, so there may be apples and oranges mixed in. But, still, ARRL seems
the only one to regularly test transmitters. Rob Sherwood does a fabulous job
on receivers, but doesn't have equivalent data on transmitters.
I can see why someone might not want to take on the liability for putting up
numbers on a web page...
Kim N5OP
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|