TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Transmitters...

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Transmitters...
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:48:13 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I strongly concur with the "welcome back Jim."
Hope you didn't give the Doc's and nurses too hard of a time!  ;-)

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of bill NY9H
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 7:01 PM
To: k9yc@arrl.net; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Transmitters...

Jim,
1 st  welcome back....
2nd  Regarding th e charts , would the new synths make any difference ????

3rd     ikz retired !!!!!


At 12:42 PM 12/10/2015, you wrote:
>On Thu,12/10/2015 9:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote:
>>Has anyone gone to the (considerable) trouble to compile what numbers 
>>they can about transmitter IMD performance (at least) and possibly 
>>phase noise from ARRL tests?
>
>I posted a link yesterday. k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>