TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT corporate

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT corporate
From: Paul Gentry <phgentry@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:18:04 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Let's all hope goes well and not as the current reincarnation of Heathkit
is over at Heathkit.com with a strange product offering, no communication,
and as here- a bunch of speculation and opinions.

Paul K4BWG




On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Brian KA9EGW <ka9egw@ka9egw.com> wrote:

> My point was strictly intended to be about unrealistic expectations like
> for an analogy expecting Cadillac quality for a Kia price.
> People can have their radios fixed wherever they want to.  That's their
> choice, I couldn't care less, ain't my business, ain't worth my time.
> People can charge however much or little they want to.  I couldn't care
> less about that either.  Ain't my business or worth my time either.
> Last time I checked we were still living in a capitalist free market
> economy.
> But I have to draw a line when people think they're going to walk into my
> shop and tell me how to run my business, regardless of what line of
> business I'm in.
>
> 73, Brian KA9EGW
>
> sent from my device that creates typos
>
> On Jan 7, 2016 9:51 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Brian, if I understand your analogy, you seem to be saying that you
> > shouldn't buy a Ten-Tec unless you are willing to pay them to service it.
> > Sorry to drag this unending morass on further, but there are other worthy
> > owner servicing options than just paying the manufacturer/dealer.
> >
> > 73, Barry N1EU
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Brian KA9EGW <ka9egw@ka9egw.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We've established there are costs of doing business.  Customers either
> > > choose to pay enough to offset those costs, or they don't.  Pure and
> > > simple.  My daily driver is a 15-year-old American luxury car, and I
> > > accepted up front that it would cost more to fix at a Cadillac
> dealership
> > > than it would cost to have "Sammy Shadetree" fix a Ford Escort.  If
> I'm not
> > > willing to pay those higher repair costs I have no business driving a
> > > Cadillac.  Either way I have no right to complain--the effects of
> others'
> > > free-will decisions get no sympathy from me, nor should I expect
> others'
> > > sympathy for the effects of mine.  If/when the car breaks down, I will
> > > either choose to "put on my big boy pants" and pay to have it fixed,
> or I
> > > will make a different choice and won't be driving a Cadillac.  I have
> no
> > > right to expect GM to build Cadillacs for the price of a Kia.  Now
> PLEASE
> > > can we get back to talking about the radios, and not bicker about the
> > > manufacturer's corporate stuff?
> > > 73, Brian KA9EGW
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>