TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Sherwood Report

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Sherwood Report
From: Paul via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:16:27 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Evidently the good reports on O1 were not reaching to see all the complaints on 
the 
Reflector in the beginning. 

Paul kw4bd


Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 28, 2016, at 8:18 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The Orion also tends to develop encoder connectivity issues as it ages.
> Personally, I wouldn't recommend an Orion 565 unless the new owner is
> self-reliant for performing some maintenance.  The Orion II 566 seems to
> age more gracefully.  These comments are solely based on personal
> experience and a matter of my own opinion.
> 
> 73, Barry N1EU
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Mark van Wijk, PA5MW <pa5mw@home.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, provided that:
>> 
>> - The ORION or ORION II  at least has the A9-board upgrade
>> - The memory backup battery was replaced within the last 2 yrs
>> - Owner learns to use AGC and RF gain (never set it at 100)
>> ....perhaps some more....
>> 
>> Certainly the Wikipage is a great help.
>> 
>> 73 Mark, PA5MW
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I fully agree.
>> An O1, if clean and from a non-smoking shack, is probably the best value
>> (bang for the buck) there ever was on the used market.
>> 
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>