TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] IC7300

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] IC7300
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:09:37 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I think the 16-bit ADC equipped direct sampling ANAN and Flex 6K receivers
give up nothing to the O2/K3s.  FWIW, I've compared them all.  It's a
matter of ergonomic preference as far as I'm concerned.  The receivers are
all very impressive and not that different in terms of performance.  The
IC7300 is going to be a notch below them in rx performance.

Barry N1EU

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, <gunnerjuulnyholm@me.com> wrote:

> Agree, Rick.
>
> My O2 is actually a SDR rig with a front end with roofing filtering
> (IF-SDR). That front end selectivity and its dual rx’s sure makes it
> expensive, but also in a class not obtainable (now) for a pure direct
> conversion SDR. The DSP capabilities are impressive for both and a great
> improvement.
> But I think my O2 (or a K3s) is sharper when hunting for that much wanted
> prefix. - Like a Porsche will get you there quicker than a Citroën, but at
> a price!
>
> 73, Gunner/OZ6NF
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>