Barry, I'm not sure if the 6300 (entry level) is in that class.
It does not have the front bandpass filters that the 6500 and 6700 have.
73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] IC7300
I think the 16-bit ADC equipped direct sampling ANAN and Flex 6K receivers give
up nothing to the O2/K3s. FWIW, I've compared them all. It's a matter of
ergonomic preference as far as I'm concerned. The receivers are all very
impressive and not that different in terms of performance. The
IC7300 is going to be a notch below them in rx performance.
Barry N1EU
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, <gunnerjuulnyholm@me.com> wrote:
> Agree, Rick.
>
> My O2 is actually a SDR rig with a front end with roofing filtering
> (IF-SDR). That front end selectivity and its dual rx’s sure makes it
> expensive, but also in a class not obtainable (now) for a pure direct
> conversion SDR. The DSP capabilities are impressive for both and a
> great improvement.
> But I think my O2 (or a K3s) is sharper when hunting for that much
> wanted prefix. - Like a Porsche will get you there quicker than a
> Citroën, but at a price!
>
> 73, Gunner/OZ6NF
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|