blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Amen! Keep preaching.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, July 15, 2016, 8:58 AM, Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net> wrote:
What gets me is seeing folks obsessing over getting "only 90W" out of their
100W rated rig on some particular band but then ignoring the inefficiencies
of their generic autotuner/balun setup and/or antenna. Give me 50W (or even
5W) and a low-loss matching and feed system into an efficient antenna and
I'll outdo your 100W into a lossy matching system/feedline and poor antenna.
The commercial VHF/UHF (and ham 60M etc.) system of ERP (Effective Radiated
Power) consisting of TX power out - feedline losses X antenna gain is also
applicable at HF and a more realistic picture than just TX output.
/rant off HI HI!!
73, Al
On Fri July 15 2016 5:21:25 am Vic Klein wrote:
> Actually, that sounds pretty good to me. My Omni VII spends more time at
> 50w than at 100 as that is where it sits to drive my amp and where I
> usually operate for digital modes. However, I imagine the 50w rig would
> need to run at 25w for the latter? Still, the price is very good for those
> specs. For years my main rig was a Triton I with only 50w and I worked the
> world with that. After all, it is only a half an S-unit down if all things
> are equal.
>
> That said, I imagine it would not be popular with new hams, even at the
> price. Without operating experience the 50w difference seems huge. I've
> seen some go for a 70w 2m rig instead of a 50w just for the extra power
> when that is all but imperceptible on 2m FM. They buy from basic features
> with weight given to what they understand...like more power is better, but
> they may not understand noise floors and such. If I was considering to
> build this, I think I would find a way to get it to 100w to appear more
> competitive with, for example, and IC-7300.
>
> =Vic=
> WA4THR
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject:[TenTec] OT: Question to the group
> From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
> Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:43:26 +0200
> List-post:<tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
>
> What would you guys think of a new radio that had the following
> characteristics:
>
> Ø SDR radio with knobs, similar size and form factor to the IC-7300
>
> Ø Superior receiver to the IC-7300; roughly on par with the Flex 6300
>
> Ø 50w of output power
>
> Ø Cost: $1000
>
> I guess the big question is, is 50w a show stopper.
>
> Had someone ask me that question recently (obviously with the intent to
> build this) and I had to pass.
>
> I dunno.
>
> For me I find it OK.
>
> I usually run my Eagle at 60w and when driving my amp, it runs at 60w.
>
>
> But my gut tells me most people won?t accept a 50w transmitter.
>
> They are programmed to expect 100w.
>
>
>
> What do you guys think?
>
>
>
> 73
>
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|