I'm not saying it is good to have a low antenna, I'm just saying a low
dipole is efficient in terms of how much power it radiates, but is is
just in the wrong direction.
My particular interest right now is a good antenna for the new 475 khz
band that is coming. I have a 1000 foot dipole at 50 feet and it shows
an excellent load at 475 khz. My belief is this antenna will be more
efficient even at a 20 degree takeoff angle than a 50 foot vertical that
has a very large and inefficient loading coil and radials.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com
On 7/18/2016 6:40 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Mon,7/18/2016 3:32 PM, Carl Moreschi wrote:
Does anyone have any real data to either support this or refute it?
I've posted the link to my work several times.
http://k9yc.com/AntennaPlanning.pdf
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|