TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 165, Issue 3

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 165, Issue 3
From: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:06:25 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Scads of them on QTH.com.


> On Sep 2, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary J
>> FollettDukes HiFi
>> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 3:56 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: [TenTec] Receiver ratings question, IP3 and synthesizer noise
>> 
>> ...
>> These two existing ratings indicate that almost every DSP receiver is
>> better than any heterodyning receiver, even though it is common knowledge
>> that IC-7300?s are being dumped on the used market because they perform so
>> poorly in tough RF environments and even Icom recommends use of a
>> preselector to correct the problem.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am not seeing these dumped IC7300's. Tell me where to look please. I see
> them at $1400 new. I'm considering selling off one or two boat anchors and
> getting a fancy new mobile rig. Fancy new being a second Eagle or maybe a
> 7300 if price is right. Pre-selector function is taken care of with High Q
> mobile antenna.
> 
> I see Used Eagles from $900 to $1100. Saw one at $800 but did not have the
> $ at the time.
> Eagle was a $2500 radio before the 'liquidation'.
> Where are the $800 IC7300's? (Most likely I'll go with a used 599 :-)
> 
> 73, -Bob ah7i
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>