TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey

To: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey
From: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:43:03 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
true that!!
Hamming for over 35 years, currently have orion 1, omni 7 and an Icom 
7300…guess which is my daily driver…the 7300. To me, it simply plays better…



> On Feb 21, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Making a new transceiver that uses superhetrodyne now would be like making a 
> car that used a point ignition system now.
> 
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 58 Hogwood Rd
> Louisburg, NC 27549
> www.n4py.com
> 
> On 2/21/2017 4:37 PM, Lee wrote:
>> Why do we NEED to go that way Barry?
>> 
>> -Lee-
>> WA3FIY
>> 
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: 2/21/2017 4:21:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey
>> 
>> ;
>> Snip
>> ;
>> You will eventually NEED to go to a direct sampling architecture (Orion
>> 4), although you might get away
>>> with one legacy dsp IF rig (Orion 3).
>>> 
>>> Barry N1EU
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>