km1h@juno.com wrote:
>
> If memory serves me, Tom was discussing the ATR-15 a few months ago as
> still in production. Why wasnt it reviewed for QST? I have always >liked that
> unit.
Actually it has about the same efficiency as any other T network with
the same size capacitors, I've been doing a series of measurements on
tuners since Thursday to confirm the ARRL's published results.
The ATR-15 measures as follows for load R and loss on 1.8 MHz:
12.5 ohms 21.8% (27.8%)
25 ohms 16.5% (22.9)
50 ohms 10.6% (11.0)
100 ohms 8.9% (10.7)
200 ohms 8.1% (10.4)
400 ohms 7.4% (10.1)
800 ohms 6.9% (8.8%)
Doubling the value of C cuts low impedance losses in half. I put 500 pF
air variable caps in the ATR-15 and the 12.5 ohm loss was 13.1 percent.
I don't even come close to the MFJ-989 results they published. I
measured the values (they are the ones in brackets above) for the 989
using both an HP 4191A analyzer and a Harris RF voltmeter, as well as
confirmed on meters.
I'd not put much faith in any measurements until the guy who did the
measurements (using a MFJ-259 to make loss measurements)and I figure out
who is way off base.
73 Tom
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
Sponsored by: Akorn Access, Inc. & N4VJ / K4AAA
|