Hi Tom,
It seems like people are using the term "diversity" incorrectly. I don't
have an authoritative definition. It would be interesting to know what
people think diversity is. I can think of a few things which are NOT
diversity. Adding the RF from two or more antennas (perhaps using
combiners, phasing lines, variable attenuators, or phase shifting
networks) is a "phased array" and is not diversity. It is my
understanding that "diversity" choses the signal from the antenna which
has the best S/N ratio or bit error rate. This is often done using
separate receivers AFTER the signals have been demodulated and are
audio, or a data stream. If some kind of control is selecting the best
antenna going to a single receiver, it might also be called diversity.
In microwave communications the terms "space diversity" and "frequency
diversity" are used. Space diversity uses two antennas, two receivers
and some sort of "voting" system to select the better signal. Frequency
diversity requires all of that and two transmitters at the other end on
two frequencies. If the "selection" of best signal is done in the
operators head, using separate signals in each ear, maybe that is also a
form of diversity. Perhaps a phased array with some kind of control loop
dynamically adjusting the relative phase and amplitude from the two or
more antennas would also be a correct application of the word "diversity"?
I would be interested to know what is the real defintion of the word
diversity in the context of RF communications?
Ken N6KB
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|