Hello,
A good test to see the interaction in play is to use EZNEC. Model a
Beverage antenna and a 1/4 wave parasitic self resonate vertical near it.
Move the vertical all around the Beverage in the model and watch the induced
current in the 1/4 wave vertical. This shows some very interesting
information!
Don Andersen, w7dd
> Jim is right on the mark.
>
> Because my 160 m antennas are confined in-line on a very narrow ridge
> I have lots of interaction problems between the Beverage and the main
> array. The Beverage begins about 150' east of the array, directly in
> line with it. That's much too close for comfort but I have no way to
> change that. As long as both are looking the same direction the noise
> injection from the main array into the Beverage isn't too bad but when
> the array is firing east and I want to take quick listen to the west
> with Beverage the noise injection is very noticeable because the
> Beverage is looking right into the array. I have to switch the main
> array to west to cut that down. I can also get noise when listening
> on the main array from the Beverage. Of course every time I run a
> test, I get a little different result because the noise is always
> varying.
>
> I think this illustrates the general problem with multiple antennas in
> close proximity, the idle ones can very well inject noise into the
> active one if the idle antennas are not disabled in some manner. The
> problem decreases with wider spacing but on 160 m that may take a lot
> of real estate.
>
> For anyone serious about improved weak signal reception, this is
> something to think about. Has anyone on the reflector taken a closer
> look at this problem and have any solutions or observations?
>
> 73, Rudy N6LF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|