[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top?

To: <>
Subject: Re: Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top?
From: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:05:01 -0400
List-post: <>
I agree with Earl.

Much of the difference in opinion on this subject has to do with what
is really a fairly complex situation. It is convenient if a whole
category of proposed construction is defined by a nice simple rule,
but towers with all the stuff hanging off are anything but simple.

The only good way to get a handle on the kind of behavior a tower and
all it's attachments will display is to put all the metal in a model
and let the program add up all the vectors and impedances.

Sometimes small changes on the tower make huge changes in behavior,
other times adding a beam might not change anything. Sometimes the
intuitive behavior is what happens, other times something else. It
just depends.

Trying to figure out how a tower will load without a model usually is
shooting in the dark. Other times you get lucky.

Model it. It will give you a good idea what YOUR situation will do.

73, Guy.

From: "Earl W Cunningham" <>

> I changed my opinion
> after modeling numerous shunt-fed towers

Topband mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>