To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: ARRL-160 viewed frm EU |
From: | "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Dec 2004 13:27:59 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Hi Wolf, observations basically the same, of course. Except that for one station, it took me half an hour to get his attention (with my inv-L), and you only had to call once. As my good friend on4un says, there is no such thing as a free lunch...I know my inv-L is way inferior to optimized antenna systems such as you have, under less than mediocre propagation conditions. 61 Qs, 35 sections worked, and a bunch which never heard my signal. 73 - Mark - on4ww ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr .Wolf Ostwald" <df2py@t-online.de> To: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:08 AM Subject: Topband: ARRL-160 viewed frm EU The US stations were hearing very well (almost at least) 73 de wolf -df2py- BTW : i`d like to hear from other EUs what their observations were.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Sloper debate, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: ARRL 160 test PLAYTIME, Dennis Peterson |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: ARRL-160 viewed frm EU, Dr .Wolf Ostwald |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL-160 viewed frm EU, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |