| To: | <n6wg@comcast.net>, <topband@contesting.com>,"Earl W Cunningham" <k6se@juno.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Better low band conditions? |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:28:08 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> activity and DX definitely varied with the ham migration to and from 160m > and the higher frequencies, and sunspots didn't seem to make that much > difference. I'd go along with that. I think conditions were just as good at the peak of the SS cycle as now. As a matter of fact, I think they are worse now then they were around 2000. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Better low band conditions?, Herb Schoenbohm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Re better conditions, ROBBERT BRIGGS |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Better low band conditions?, Earl W Cunningham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Better low band conditions?, Tree |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |