Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 1/4 versus double L

To: w7dra@juno.com, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 1/4 versus double L
From: "peter dixon" <pj_dixon@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:08:21 +0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>




>From: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com
>
>
>all this vertical antenna on the top of a hill talk is scarring me. i
>have the same problem, and i plan to put up a YCCC double L, an antenna
>not heard about on this reflector in quite a while. during the CQWW this
>last November, i used an inverted L (50 feet of it vertical) with two
>drooping 130 foot radials. not much of an antenna, in my estimation.
>
>mike w7dra
>_______________________________________________
>*******Hi Mike I'm also thinking of putting up the K2KQ double L...would be 
>interested to know what the antenna sages think of it re. all the recent 
>talk abt earth losses..I suppose the bottom horizontal arm will be fairly 
>close to the ground and may generate losses?


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>