To: | "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:36:58 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Tod -ID wrote: > I guess I have the wrong idea about how the radials of a vertical work. > For > some reason I thought that they operated as a 'screen' that kept the > return > currents out of the ground enough so that the "ground" losses were less. The trouble with this theory is that it predicts that 1/2 wave verticals with no radials, 1/4 wave verticals with a few elevated radials, and ground plane antennas shouldn't work very well. Actual tests should otherwise. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical, Rick Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires, Gene Smar |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires, Tod -ID |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: insulated vs:bare radial wires, Gene Smar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |