Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 97, Issue 18

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 97, Issue 18
From: K3vw@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:06:28 EST
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
To those interested, I have several brand new 1000' wooden reels of  
Commscope RG-6 coax for $75/ reel. Willy K3VW
 
 
In a message dated 1/16/2011 1:32:40 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
topband-request@contesting.com writes:

Send  Topband mailing list submissions to
topband@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide  Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
or, via email, send a  message with subject or body 'help' to
topband-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the  list at
topband-owner@contesting.com

When replying,  please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of  Topband digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Shunt  tower help (James C. Hall, MD)
2. First attempt at beverage  antenna, not working as expected
(Mark  Lunday)
3. Re: Shunt tower help (James C. Hall,  MD)
4. Re: First attempt at beverage antenna,    not  working as
expected (Mark Lunday)
5.  Re: First attempt at beverage antenna,    not working as
expected (Greg - ZL3IX)
6. Re: First attempt at  beverage antenna,    not working as
expected  (KL7RA)
7. TB Recovery?  (calle.jonsson@sverige.nu)
8. Re: First attempt at beverage  antenna, not working as
expected (Rick  Stealey)
9. Re: First attempt at beverage antenna,   not working as
expected (Rik van  Riel)
10. Re: First attempt at beverage antenna, not working  as
expected  (donovanf@starpower.net)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message:  1
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:22:43 -0600
From: "James C. Hall, MD"  <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
Subject: Topband: Shunt tower help
To:  <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <005401cbb502$bb3006c0$31901440$@com>
Content-Type:  text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Hello TB:



I  have a problem -I cannot seem to get a decent match either with Gamma  or
Omega matching. My situation is a complex one that doesn't lend well  to
modeling and I am forced to trying trial and error - mostly the latter.  My
tower is 120 feet of Rohn 45 that has attached (non-insulated) EHS guy  
wires
which makes it essentially a pyramidal cage vertical. I have two  yagis in a
stack arrangement that each have a 44 foot boom with insulated  elements -
one at 120', and the other at 60' on a TIC ring rotator. The  shunt (gamma)
wire must be attached below this lower antenna an is at about  56 feet. It 
is
separated from the tower by 22". Right now I don't have much  in the way of 
a
radial system - I'll just leave it at that for  now.



I have two vacuum variable capacitors available to me - a  350pf and a
1000pf. With just a gamma arrangement, I can get the SWR to  about 5:1. At
this point, my MFJ antenna analyzer shows a Rs=5 and Xs=0.  Now, upon 
hooking
up the omega capacitor (parallel to ground), and with all  the threads at
minimum (minimum capacitance), the Rs jumps up to 194 with  Xs remaining at
0. Adding capacitance here will increase the Rs  further.



I just don't know what to do at this point. I would  appreciate any guidance
to this situation - while I still have hair I  haven't pulled out !



73,  Jamie

WB4YDL





=======
Email scanned by PC  Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware  Database:  6.16700)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======


------------------------------

Message:  2
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:14:09 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday"  <mlunday@nc.rr.com>
Subject: Topband: First attempt at beverage  antenna, not working as
expected
To:  <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <002a01cbb523$0fc5dfa0$2f519ee0$@rr.com>
Content-Type:  text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

My first beverage, I was  expecting better results.

I could only roll out 250 feet of new,  insulated 14 gauge stranded wire, 
but
I did get it consistently about 6  feet above ground.  The ground slopes 
away
at about 10 degrees angle  and at the end of the wire the slope increases to
35 degrees and goes into  a creek bed.  The ground then rises again on the
other side of the  creek bed.  250 kV power lines on 200 foot towers at 600
foot away,  although no noise is noticed.

I do have the 450 ohm resistor at the far  end for termination, a ground rod
at each end with somewhat moist  conditions (snow melt), 250 foot of low 
loss
coax.

The transformer  and resistor are from DX engineering, so I do not suspect 
an
issue with the  parts.

I read that a bev antenna "wants to work"

What I hear on  40, 80, and 160 is a much lower noise floor, no gain (none
expected), but I  don't hear a better S/N on the EU stations - beverage
pointed 045 true from  here in NC.  I expected to hear the EU stations
"better" on the  beverage.

I am using a Flex 3000, so I do not have (nor should I need)  a pre-amp.

Any suggestions welcome.  I realize that the length is  not optimum for 160,
but it should do better than my inverted  L.

Thanks

Mark  Lunday
WD4ELG




------------------------------

Message:  3
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:15:11 -0600
From: "James C. Hall, MD"  <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Shunt tower help
To:  <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <00ad01cbb523$3e58f050$bb0ad0f0$@com>
Content-Type:  text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Hello TB:

Thanks so  much for the great replies !! Bottom line is I need to insulate
the tower  from the guys. Several mentioned using a grid dipper to discover
the actual  resonant frequency of the tower and then go from there. This
spring, I'll  definitely do both and then get back in the action.

Thanks  again.

73, Jamie
WB4YDL





=======
Email  scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21,  Virus/Spyware Database:  6.16700)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======


------------------------------

Message:  4
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:44:53 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday"  <mlunday@nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt at beverage  antenna,    not working
as expected
To: "'Mark  Lunday'" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>,     <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <000001cbb527$5acda650$1068f2f0$@rr.com>
Content-Type:  text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"

Additional notes:

EU  stations that I can hear S7 on the 80 meter half-square, are reduced to
NIL  on the beverage.

I can hear some US stations to the  NE.

_____________________________________________
From: Mark Lunday  [mailto:mlunday@nc.rr.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 9:14 PM
To:  'topband@contesting.com'
Subject: First attempt at beverage antenna, not  working as expected


My first beverage, I was expecting better  results.

I could only roll out 250 feet of new, insulated 14 gauge  stranded wire, 
but
I did get it consistently about 6 feet above  ground.  The ground slopes 
away
at about 10 degrees angle and at the  end of the wire the slope increases to
35 degrees and goes into a creek  bed.  The ground then rises again on the
other side of the creek  bed.  250 kV power lines on 200 foot towers at 600
foot away, although  no noise is noticed.

I do have the 450 ohm resistor at the far end for  termination, a ground rod
at each end with somewhat moist conditions (snow  melt), 250 foot of low 
loss
coax.

The transformer and resistor are  from DX engineering, so I do not suspect 
an
issue with the parts.

I  read that a bev antenna "wants to work"

What I hear on 40, 80, and 160  is a much lower noise floor, no gain (none
expected), but I don't hear a  better S/N on the EU stations - beverage
pointed 045 true from here in  NC.  I expected to hear the EU stations
"better" on the  beverage.

I am using a Flex 3000, so I do not have (nor should I need)  a pre-amp.

Any suggestions welcome.  I realize that the length is  not optimum for 160,
but it should do better than my inverted  L.

Thanks

Mark  Lunday
WD4ELG




------------------------------

Message:  5
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:36:16 +1300
From: Greg - ZL3IX  <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt at beverage  antenna,    not working
as expected
To:  topband@contesting.com
Message-ID:  <4D329FF0.3080605@inet.net.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi Mark,

250ft is VERY short  for a TB Beverage.  You will get some F/B, but the 
front lobe will be  very broad.  Can you extend it at all, maybe asking 
some kind  neighbours to use a bit of their land?  500 ft is really about  
minimum and 1000 ft even better.

73, Greg, ZL3IX

On  2011-01-16 15:14, Mark Lunday wrote:
> My first beverage, I was  expecting better results.
>
> I could only roll out 250 feet of  new, insulated 14 gauge stranded wire, 
but
> I did get it consistently  about 6 feet above  ground.


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date:  Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:05:33 -0900
From: "KL7RA"  <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt at beverage  antenna,    not working
as expected
To: "Mark  Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>,  <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <004e01cbb55c$8b93a980$6e49a8c0@40M>
Content-Type:  text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"

> My first beverage, I  was expecting better results.

Most will mention 250 feet is too short  and that might be the reason as it
will not match 9:1 or that 450 Ohm  resistor. 

A working beverage is easy to recognize as the noise drops  to zero and 
signals 
really "pop" out of the noise. They are magic antennas  when they are built 
correctly and I can tell quickly when one has a  problem.

I suggest measuring the antenna with a MFJ 259B and check the  SWR. All 
mine run around 2:1 from 1.8 to maybe 2.2 Mhz. If the SWR is high  and
the coax and all connections are okay I would change the length some  how
to 500+ feet or use one of the variable transformers with its variable  
resistor
package sold by some companies that sell Beverage  electronics.

By the way I built a new Beverage this winter and it  didn't work, excess 
SWR.
I found the new 500 ft spool of RG-6 from Home  depot had a bad spot in it 
where there spliced the cable by a simple  overlap of the braid. 

73 Rich KL7RA  


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 16  Jan 2011 09:54:29 +0100 (CET)
From: calle.jonsson@sverige.nu
Subject:  Topband: TB Recovery?
To: topband@contesting.com
Message-ID:
<49269.83.251.183.179.1295168069.squirrel@alexander.fl-net.se>
Content-Type:  text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

Looks like condx are back to what they  were say 5 years back with deep
downs and huge ups. Great openings to  midwest the past week (599 sigs from
W0BV,
W0FLS, AA0RS etc. Also good  propagations to VK, DU and YB during the same
time. But where are the  JA:s?? Also heard W6OAR 579 a few days ago.

73 SM6CPY  Carl


-----------------------------------------
Skaffa gratis  e-post du ocks? p?  http://www.sverige.nu





------------------------------

Message:  8
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:15:00 +0000
From: Rick Stealey  <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt at  beverage antenna, not working
as expected
To:  <topband@contesting.com>
Message-ID:  <COL124-W6E9337BF91FE6274B7D3ECEF50@phx.gbl>
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Sounds like "maybe" something is  not working.  If you have an antenna 
analyzer 
can you do a sweep from  160 up to 40 m?  There should be a relatively flat
SWR over the whole  range.  Without the far end terminated the impedance and
therefore the  SWR will flop all over the place.  That would show you that 
the  
transformer, resistor and connections are ok.  Then measure down at  the
shack end of the coax and it should also be flat, maybe even a little  
flatter.  If you suspect the coax you can also get a loss reading  on
it with the antenna analyzer by open circuiting it and taking a  reading.
Your length is a bit short, though.  As I understand the Bev  starts
playing pretty well at 500 feet and up, so your results might be  what's
expected.  Mine is 550 feet and most of the time it beats the  inv L
on EU signals from here in NJ.  But not always, and sometimes  the 
difference is minimal.  But there are times when a signal is at  the 
noise level on the L, and switching to the Beverage it becomes  readable
but not a HUGE difference.  
Rick  K2XT


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sun, 16 Jan  2011 09:39:44 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject:  Re: Topband: First attempt at beverage antenna,    not  working
as expected
To:  topband@contesting.com
Message-ID:  <4D330330.4060207@surriel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

On 01/15/2011 09:44 PM, Mark Lunday  wrote:
> Additional notes:
>
> EU stations that I can hear  S7 on the 80 meter half-square, are reduced 
to
> NIL on the  beverage.
>
> I can hear some US stations to the NE.

That  seems consistent with a half wave beverage having
a really really high  takeoff angle.  Something on the
order of 70 degrees,  IIRC...

*googles around*

Ahhh, there is the web page with that  info:

http://www.seed-solutions.com/gregordy/Amateur%20Ra
dio/Experimentation/Beverage.htm

--  
All rights  reversed.


------------------------------

Message:  10
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:43:54 -0500 (EST)
From:  <donovanf@starpower.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt at  beverage antenna, not working
as expected
To:  topband@contesting.com
Message-ID:  <20110116104354.BLT35570@ms10.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Rick,

Obviously something is  very wrong with your new Beverage.  While your 
Beverage is too short for  really good performance on 160 meters, it should 
perform very well on 80 and  40 meters.  Please run some tests on those bands.  
If its not  performing as you expect on 80 and 40, you have some kind of 
serious problem  in the antenna, transmission line or connectors.

A simplest measurement  you can make is DC resistance.  Assuming your 
matching transformer  provides a DC short across the far end of your coaxial 
cable, the shack end of  the coax cable should read just one or two ohms.

If thats okay, you  need to make some RF measurements.  An MFJ-259 is an 
excellent and  inexpensive tool.  With the Beverage terminated you should see 
VSWR less  than 1.5:1 across a broad frequency range.  When you remove the  
termination, the VSWR should change dramatically with frequency.

Please  share your results with us.  Beverages just want to work, its 
nearly  impossible to get really poor performance without a fault in the system 
unless  its installed over salt water.

Good  luck!

73
Frank
W3LPL


---- Original message  ----
>Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:15:00 +0000
>From: Rick Stealey  <rstealey@hotmail.com>  
>Subject: Re: Topband: First attempt  at beverage antenna, not working as 
expected  
>To:  <topband@contesting.com>
>
>
>Sounds like "maybe"  something is not working.  If you have an antenna 
analyzer 
>can  you do a sweep from 160 up to 40 m?  There should be a relatively  
flat
>SWR over the whole range.  Without the far end terminated the  impedance 
and
>therefore the SWR will flop all over the place.   That would show you that 
the 
>transformer, resistor and connections are  ok.  Then measure down at the
>shack end of the coax and it should  also be flat, maybe even a little 
>flatter.  If you suspect the  coax you can also get a loss reading on
>it with the antenna analyzer by  open circuiting it and taking a reading.
>Your length is a bit short,  though.  As I understand the Bev starts
>playing pretty well at 500  feet and up, so your results might be what's
>expected.  Mine is  550 feet and most of the time it beats the inv L
>on EU signals from  here in NJ.  But not always, and sometimes the 
>difference is  minimal.  But there are times when a signal is at the 
>noise level  on the L, and switching to the Beverage it becomes readable
>but not a  HUGE difference.  
>Rick  K2XT
>        
>_______________________________________________
>UR RST IS ...  ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw?  BK


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Topband  mailing  list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband


End  of Topband Digest, Vol 97, Issue  18
***************************************

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 97, Issue 18, K3vw <=