Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)

To: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, "Topband" <Topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:22:15 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Yeah, but how many work the 160 contest under discussion and how many other 
contests use the MAR multiplier?

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
To: "Topband" <Topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)


> You may be partially right, but we have 35 members in the Maritime Contest
> Club and another 4 or 5 active or semi active stations that contest, that
> are NOT part of the club.  Granted , not everyone is on for every contest,
> but as I said before, for any of the popular contests, we are much more
> prevalent than some sections or States in the USA.
> I would say on average and as an example we have 10 ACTIVE members for the
> CQWW contests.
> Try finding 10 Rhode Island, Delaware , Montana or East Bay stations on !
>
> Mike VE9AA
>
> Mike, Coreen & Corey Smith
> 699 Rte 616 Keswick Ridge
> NB
> Canada
> E6L 1T1
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: ZR
>  To: Mike & Coreen Smith ; Topband
>  Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 12:52 PM
>  Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)
>
>
>  Low ham population and a small geographical area Mike.
>
>  You, or anyone else aint gonna change the ARRL for any reason...its a
>  dictatorship.
>
>  Carl
>  KM1H
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
>  To: "Topband" <Topband@contesting.com>
>  Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 10:49 AM
>  Subject: Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)
>
>
>  > In a slightly different vein (but keeping with the same theme overall
>  > theme).....
>  >
>  > "MAR" section includes NB (VE9), NS (VE1) and VY2 (PEI).....sometimes
> MAR
>  > even included VO1 and VO2 !!!
>  >
>  > We have to compete against hams in three provinces for most ARRL
> contests.
>  > Does RI get lumped in with EMA and CT? - Nope!
>  > Does Montana get lumped in with Wyoming and Kansas?  - Nope!
>  >
>  > Why is it the ARRL sees it fit to make three provinces compete against
> one
>  > another?
>  > Tell me what other 48 contiguous states compete against one another?
>  >
>  > Maybe 50 years ago there was little to no activity in, what was then,
>  > always
>  > VE1, but for most any semi-major or major contest that happens, you 
> will
>  > work 5-10 MAR stations with VE1, 9 and VY2 prefixes.  We've had 
> separate
>  > prefixes here since the early 1990's.......approaching 20 yrs !!!
>  >
>  > I would rather compete against my province-mates.
>  >
>  > Mike VE9AA (NB and proud of it !)
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>  >
>  >
>  > -----
>  > No virus found in this message.
>  > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>  > Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2102/4056 - Release Date: 12/04/11
>  >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>  No virus found in this incoming message.
>  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>  Version: 8.5.454 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4053 - Release Date: 12/02/11
> 19:41:00
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2102/4056 - Release Date: 12/04/11
> 

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>