Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 160M JT65HF
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:23:17 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 12/30/2011 04:14 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 12/30/2011 9:14 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>> Most JT65 activity is relatively low power - typically between 10 and
>> 50 watts on HF.
>
> Yes, but if I were trying to work a difficult path like EU on 160M from
> here in W6, I would be running as much power as I thought my power amp
> could safely handle for the 50 second keydown cycle -- (probably about
> 500W).
>
> Thor's very informative post about the far more limited spectrum on 160M
> in his country was also quite helpful, and it helped a lot in
> understanding his concerns.

Agreed.

I believe it would be a polite thing for all the digital ops
to happen around 1838, so as to not cause interference to the
CW ops lower in the band.

-- 
All rights reversed.
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>