Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?
From: "Mike & Coreen Smith" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Reply-to: Mike & Coreen Smith <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:03:52 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Didn't I read somewhere that this band only allowed 1W ERP and antennas less 
than 10m  high or am I thinking of another allocation?

VE9AA
Mike

Mike, Coreen & Corey Smith
699 Rte 616 Keswick Ridge
NB
Canada
E6L 1T1
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rik van Riel
  To: topband@contesting.com
  Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:48 AM
  Subject: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?


  Things are looking good at WRC-12. Approval of an international
  amateur radio allocation around 470 kHz seems very likely:

  http://www.arrl.org/news/agenda-item-1-23-passes-committee-moves-to-plenary

  This does, of course, lead to the question of antennas.

  What can people without a few acres to dedicate to 600m do to
  get a vaguely decent antenna?

  I started modeling an inverted L with an FCP and a loading
  coil the size of a rain barrel.  Then I added more top wires,
  in more directions, and the loading coil is only half the size
  of a rain barrel :)

  Before loading coil losses, gain is about -10dBi!

  Nowhere near as easy as 160m, but this could be a very
  interesting antenna challenge for hams...

  -- 
  All rights reversed.
  _______________________________________________
  UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4206 - Release Date: 02/12/12 
19:34:00
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>