Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Short radials?

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Short radials?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:07:15 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
It's important to note that this data is for AM broadcast towers, which in the time frame when this work was done, were mostly a quarter wave tall to 5/8 wave tall. While it is considered the standard for that sort of antenna system and budget, it is not particularly relevant unless you have a quarter wave vertical and a lot of money to spend on copper.

The work by N6LF is far more relevant to the question at hand, because it looks at radials in the context of shorter antennas (as a fraction of a wavelength) that most hams use, and that this post asked about.

http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/2010/03/relation-between-vertical-height-and-radial-length.html

73, Jim K9YC

 On 9/27/2012 10:14 AM, Richard Fry wrote:
The measured data linked below shows how the number of buried radials affects the performance of monopoles of various height to 90 degrees, for an applied power of 1 kW. Earth conductivity at the test site was about 4 mS/m.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/BLandERadials.gif
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>