Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop

To: <k6uj@pacbell.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop
From: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:51:10 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I will let all know, Bob - plan to erect it in about two weeks, in preparation 
for the Pre-Stew and the ARRL 160 contest (I'll be on travel the month of 
December so will miss out on the Big Stew) and I'll "report out" as soon as I 
have some observations to pass on!

72, Jim R. K9JWV

> From: k6uj@pacbell.net
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:41:28 -0700
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop
> 
> If you try the K6STI low noise loop please let us know your results.   I have 
> tried a number of low noise receiving loops, currently 
> am playing with a Waller flag.  The K6STI loop is very interesting, I may try 
> it myself also.  
> 
> 73,
> Bob
> K6UJ
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:
> 
> > Well, there is no "modeling" associated with this effort, Tom - they just 
> > "did it".....built it, tuned it and used it! I've attached the article for 
> > perusal, if interested....Jim R.
> >>> 
> > 
> > I saw the original article. This one uses an isolated primary secondary 
> > coupling system.
> > 
> > Try it and see if it works reliably in your installation. I think with a 
> > good layout and feedline routing you should be OK with this method. 
> > _______________________________________________
> > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
                                          
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>