To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity |
From: | cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:04:51 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Hello Richard, >The following link illustrates these pattern effects for a wide range of >conductivities, other things equal. >http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/Monopole_Surf_Wv_Compare.jpg What I understand from your simulation (above) is that the near and far field are functions to ground conductivity. The less ground conductivity, the less electrical field will be measured (near/far filed). That means, the radiation pattern will be affected too because the electromagnetic wave will be much curved to the ground, so the ground wave intensity will be direct proportional with the conductivity. Is it right? Regards, 73 de YO3FFF Cristi _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 meter elevated vertical, Mike Waters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Richard Fry |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Richard Fry |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity, Richard Fry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |