To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: "T" vs Inverted "L" over FCP |
From: | Charles Damico <frontsight41@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | Charles Damico <frontsight41@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:05:22 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Just wondering... I'm thinking about possibly using a T configuration instead of an Inverted L over an FCP. I just don't have a straight, unobstructed 85' for the horizontal leg of the L. Each leg of the T would not be flat-top, rather would resemble a high angle inverted V (about 150-deg). The FCP was constructed a couple of months ago, but I never got around to installing the radiator portion. Any insight/suggestions would be welcome. Too late for ARRL 160, but maybe CQ??... Thanks, Chuck AJ1E _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: detuning shunt fed tower, Guy Olinger K2AV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: PT0S TB Summary, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: "Antique Wireless Association" 1929 QSO Party, Eddy Swynar |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: "T" vs Inverted "L" over FCP, Herb Schoenbohm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |