Respectfully, I don't think this is anywhere close to right. For
example, the CAC did an exemplary job of developing a League position on
where Skimmer techn0ology fit in its contests. A lot depends on the CAC
chairman at any given time, and on getting the ARRL Board to give the
CAC the right tasks to do.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 12/1/2012 8:09 AM, Greg Chartrand wrote:
It doesn't make any sense, and its not intended to.
I've given up with the league. My experience has been that the "advisory" boards have
virtually no influence on decisions that are made about contests or anything for that matter.
That's why I stopped contributing to this "private club".
-----------------------
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thanks for the comments Ron. For some reason I just can't think of how
in a 160 meter international contest that if you work KH6 you get no
additional multiplier for working Guam, Wake Island, Swains, American
Samoa, Midway, Johnson, Kingman Reef, Kure Island! These are all
separate entities over at the so call ARRL DXCC Desk but apparently not
at the "Contest Desk".
How does this make any sense?
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
|