Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: F fitting adaptors

To: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: F fitting adaptors
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:24:54 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Reference to my email, I did not state I had an Ameritron. In fact I have no remotely switched receiving antennas. All receive antennas are switched in the shack. Come to my QTH and walk the field and woods and see.....(Watch out for Deer ticks.) The Ameritron reference was to give an idea what was wanted for an adaptor. Also, the adaptors are for a friend.

Hi Bruce,

That aside, my comments apply to all relays in receive paths. Zero current and voltage or near zero current and voltage relays have a very high failure rate due to contact resistance.

This "frequently" happens inside amplifiers (even with brand new sealed relays) and in higher power antenna switches.

I just thought I'd point out, with the possible exception of vacuum relays, higher current relays are much more problematic than low current relays. It's an odd case of smaller is better.

While some may think otherwise, this is well documented and is clearly reflected in field problem reports of antenna switches. The problem has been documented since at least the early 1900's. A "new" problem has appeared in enclosed relays, where materials in the relay slowly leech and build a very thin film. There is cleaning procedure on my website:

http://www.w8ji.com/relay_cleaning_and_life.htm

Just a bit of trivial information that may someday help someone, because it is one of the leading field problems every manufacturer using higher current relays to "dry switch" signal circuits has. It even occurs, according to relay suppliers, when lower current LED traffic lights replace old incandescent lamps.

73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>