Another way of looking at it:
There is loss in vegetation that goes up as the frequency goes up. At low
frequencies, in a seconds time, only a small amount of wavelengths pass
through a given bit of vegetation.
As the frequency goes up to UHF, and into gigahertz range, for a given
second, many many more wavelengths pass through. Each pass contributing
heat to this (slightly re-radiating) "dummy load".
They give the gigahertz range, a name of ionization waves, but this post is
trying for an alternate way of looking at it.
Microwave oven= hot dummy load= Lunch. ( ; - ))
73
Bruce-K1FZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "jim rogers" <jdrog@bellsouth.net>
To: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "Topband" <topband@contesting.com>; "Rudy Severns" <rseverns@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: tree losses
Carl et al,
Interesting, my 80M full size (66') sloper comes within about 5 ft of a
dogwood tree and it is dying. The sloped is fed 8' AGL with 2 full size
elevated radials and about 500w and the dogwood is dying from that
height(8') to the top of the tree at about 15'. Unfortunately for me, my
XYL pointed this out to me - not good. The sloper has been in that
position for about 1 year, before that the tree was doing fine.
Coincidence?
Jim N4DU
On 8/4/13 9:42 PM, ZR wrote:
I cant think of anyone claiming a tree is resonant on any particular
frequency but that doesnt mean it cant be used as an antenna. Anyone
disagreeing with that should discuss it with the military who have been
loading trees for decades for emergency communications; in the 3-8MHz
range if I remember and going back as far as the 50's. Read the old CQ
and QST's.
On another note I spent most of today outside doing tree trimming and
other sweaty exercises. I noted that my best producing Bartlett pear tree
was dead at the top and also a bit down on one side. Now it may be just
coincidence but the 80M sloper passes about 5' from the farthest out
branches and the end is exactly at the same height as the tree top.
This antenna is used at the vintage gear bench and also on the one for
amp repairs where Ive been hitting it rather hard this year with AM with
serious carrier power; the most recent being an Alpha 77SX.
I also remember wilting the top of a sugar maple about 20 years ago with
1200W on 6M to a 6/6 yagi array. After I moved the antenna to another
tower the tree recovered the following year.
Another coincidence?
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rudy Severns" <rseverns@gmail.com>
To: "Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2013 5:39 PM
Subject: Topband: tree losses
Tom's correct, the issue is not "resonance" but rather what, if
anything,
happens when you have a so-so conductor/insulator (a tree) in the
near-field and/or further out. Do the losses matter?
Performing a definitive set of experiments would be a serious
undertaking. I've fiddled around a bit but not much more than the tree
conductivity work mentioned earlier.
At this point I'm an agnostic: we really don't have good data. There are
a number of Vietnam era papers on trees as antennas and propagation
through jungle but most of that was at frequencies well above 160m.
Here's a challenge for experimenters that'll keep you busy and out of
the
bars.
73, Rudy N6LF
_________________
Topband Reflector
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3209/6051 - Release Date: 08/04/13
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
|