Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions

To: "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions
From: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:51:03 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I am requesting opinions on what would work best for 160m based on a bottom 
loaded vertical or inverted L.

I have in the past used and inverted L for 160m using a common feed with my 80m 
vertical.   The 80m vertical has parallel wires for 40m and 20m also and it 
works real well with 38 radials laid down in the grass.  I like to compare it 
to a fan dipole but only the vertical section is the multi wire part as the 
radials are buried.

Anyway I am starting to plan for the winter season and I am wondering if a 
loading coil on the bottom of the vertical would yield better results than the 
inverted L.   The L is limited to at best 50ft vertical section and the rest on 
trees.    My thoughts are if I use the 80m vertical section I will have 68 ft 
of height which may be better than the L.    The vertical is not structurally 
strong enough to add a wire or a cap hat to the top of it.

Clearly I have the ability to try both and play around but I have time to make 
alternate plans so I am fishing for opinions and or suggestions.   


~73
Don
KD8NNU
-.- -.. ---.. -. -. ..-
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>