| To: | Topband <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions | 
| From: | Don Johnson <n4dj@me.com> | 
| Date: | Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:48:35 -0400 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
I have not seen a length mentioned for the inverted L, so thought I would note that by making the inverted L longer than a quarter wave moves the high current portion up the vertical. I had good luck with an inverted L about 3/8 wave long. By good luck I mean DXCC plus some on 160. I still am trying to improve. In any event feeding the inverted L with a series capacitor made tuning a breeze. By going longer than a quarter wave made the feed point inductive and raised the R value closer to 50. 73, Don N4DJ Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Effect of trees- tree appreciation, Bob Harmon | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions, Herb Schoenbohm | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: FW: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions, Charlie Cunningham | 
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions, Herb Schoenbohm | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |