Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 contest observation

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL 160 contest observation
From: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:30:07 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The 100+ data point is relevant to the CQ WW CW contest - not the ARRL
160.  The typical QSO totals for the ARRL 160 from Japan are much less due
to low activity.

Tree N6TR

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>wrote:

> On 12/11/2013 7:56 AM, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
>
>> After CQ WW CW, I was talking with a guy in Arizona who had worked 100+
>> JA's on 160 in that test! More than half a continent away, very different
>> perspective on 160 than mine!
>>
>
> Yep. 100+ 5,500 mile QSOs, but only 1 multiplier.
>
> As to EU -- I haven't heard EU on 160 in more than two years.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>