To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:56:31 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> > On 1/22/2014 12:32 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: > 45 uH is a little marginal, but doesn't explain your problem. 100 uH would > be better. > That's the conclusion I came to after reading this article: http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/BiasT3amp.pdf But pay attention to what W8JI just said! 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee, Hardy Landskov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160???, Mike Waters |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |