To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower? |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:30:14 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 4/23/2014 8:51 PM, Ashton Lee wrote: Also, while you will get some counter argument, setting up an inverted V off the tower top will work very well too. That may have a higher angle of radiation but will be very easy to tune to a 50 ohm match. Yes and no. Although 140 ft may seem high, it's LOW as a fraction of a wavelength on 160M. :) For several years, I had a 160M dipole at 120 ft. In a LOT of A/B testes, an 86 ft Tee vertical nearly always beat it. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Ashton Lee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Gary Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Ashton Lee |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Carl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |