| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna? |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Dec 2014 13:53:45 -0800 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Wed,12/24/2014 1:05 PM, Jorge Diez CX6VM wrote: Half of one of the half go to the other side, like an inverted V That would be a pretty low dipole on 160M, and verticals tend to be far more effective on 160M than low dipoles. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?, Jorge Diez CX6VM |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?, Art Roberts - W5AER |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?, Jorge Diez CX6VM |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m Sloping Vertical Antenna?, Art Roberts - W5AER |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |