Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: winding ON4UN "braid breaker 1:1 balun

To: "Charles Yahrling" <cfytech24x7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: winding ON4UN "braid breaker 1:1 balun
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:03:59 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Planning the antenna, feedline, balun, and grounding as a *system *is more important than any single other thing we can ever do. In a complex system with standing waves (on the outside of wires and cables) and finite impedances, there is no universal "this is optimum" answer.

If your antenna is 50 feet high on 160 and the feedline is suspended for 60-80 feet to the ground connection point, it already has an invisible internal "self-balun" based on common mode impedances. :)

If the feedline runs up and is taped to a tower leg, the situation is different.

In your case, most likely almost anything you do will be more than adequate.

73 Tom







----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Yahrling" <cfytech24x7@gmail.com>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:27 AM
Subject: Topband: winding ON4UN "braid breaker 1:1 balun


All,

ON4UN lists optimum turns for binocular braid breaker baluns, but I have
not found similar info for toroidal baluns.

Using ft-106 type toroid and want to know if "more is better" or should I
limit bifilar turns to 2-3 as per binoculars?

I run qrp or 100W max, for now at least.

Just putting up a simple dipole at 50 feet to have a go at NAQCC QRP Sprint
and upcoming CQ 160.


73, 160
--
de AB1VL
NAQCC #6799

ab1vl.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4257/8923 - Release Date: 01/13/15


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>