Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Strange propagation

To: n1rj@roadrunner.com, k8bhz@alphacomm.net
Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
From: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:49:24 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
You are the control operator of that station and it is your call that is used.  



-----Original Message-----
From: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
To: Brian Mattson <k8bhz@alphacomm.net>
Cc: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>; topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 5:22 pm
Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation

And, what happened to identifying with the call of the station you were 
operating?
It's still in the regs.

73, Roger


On 1/14/2016 4:44 PM, Brian Mattson wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Louis Parascondola via Topband
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 3:27 PM
> To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com ; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
>
>> SO they did the next best thing and left it up to the individual to decide 
>> what is moral or ethical for them.  If someone gets DXCC honor roll using 
>> that system, good for them but it >doesn't hold water to me. They work 
>> really 
>> hard putting up towers on a regular basis not to mention maintaining it all. 
>>  
>> They make an honest living.
>
> Remember back in the Golden Years when it was STRICTLY FORBIDDEN to profit 
> from "amateur radio"????   When did that go away???
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 1:49 pm
> Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
>
> On Thu,1/14/2016 10:33 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote:
>
>> The problem with the US RHR deals is that it completely skews the process
>> as far as the propagation differences across the fruited plan.  I
>> would love to add to my DXCC totals as I close into the 300 mark.  USA
>> stations can do this but is it ethical.  It sure makes money for a pay
>> to play amateur radio scheme.
>
> Amen Herb!!
>
>> I strongly agree -- while it is permitted by DXCC rules, it is NOT
>> ETHICAL to use a remote station, or a different QTH of your own,
>> thousands of miles closer to a DX entity to add to your country totals.
>
>> And in reality, it IS pay to play -- nice stations cost money! There's
>> the gear, the antennas, and the real estate.
>
> Yes Jim, ALL of our stations  require those outlays, but we don't make money 
> from them!
>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> Brian,  K8BHZ
>
>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>