Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Working Europe

To: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>, Top Band Contesting <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Working Europe
From: Brian Moran via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Brian Moran <brianmo@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 23:47:05 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
A few years ago, I offered to send out binocular cores for beverages/flags etc. 
FOR FREE to people that needed them to just get on 160. Let me see if I have 
enough left to make that offer again. 
-Brian N9ADG
 

    On Friday, July 1, 2016 4:25 PM, James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com> 
wrote:
 

 Mike: I would posit we - the "top band community" - need to promote increased 
operations ---------- fuggedabout "decent rx antennas" --- just get more hams 
operating on top band:

- emphasize the Maunder minimum
- emphasize the rise of efficiency of small lot antennas, as a resulting 
"benefit"
- emphasize the benefits of a new low band rcv arrays

It's about encouraging hams to explore top band, as the "minimums" descend on 
us.....not, necessarily, encouraging "ultimate stations" --- i.e., get 'em on 
the band......

71.5/72 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV

Guy said:

>There is the issue of when people are actually listening on 160. *Sounds*
dead because no one is there.

...AND THEN there is the issue of when people *can* actually listen; by
that I mean, they have a decent rx antenna at their disposal.

I've noticed quite a few locals (W1) with increasing interest in 160. The
low-space rx antenna options out there are attracting interest. This is
good. Bring on the minimum.

Mike N1TA
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


   
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>