Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: FW: 160m Vertical Ideas?

To: "'topband List'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: FW: 160m Vertical Ideas?
From: "Ian Fugler" <zen90387@zen.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:16:09 +0100
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Is it possible to run a 128 foot wire to the top of the 89 foot tower, then 
across to the top of the 102 foot tower?  If the towers are 35 feet apart, that 
gives you pretty much a 160m quarterwave.  As many radials at the base as you 
can manage, would be a rather good (mainly vertical) aerial.

73, Ian G4IIY

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed via 
Topband
Sent: 27 October 2017 17:27
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 160m Vertical Ideas?

Greetings!

Trying to figure out my scheme for 160m.  I currently have three crank up 
towers about 35’ apart from one another. One cranks up to 106’, the next to 70’ 
and third, to 89’. 

I figured I could shunt feed one of the taller towers and call it good but I’m 
concerned about interaction amongst the towers. 

Another option is to install an independent vertical about 150’ away..   This 
would minimize any interaction and would allow me to lay more/longer radials.  
I could go up about 65’ in height. 

Inv L is not really an option, as I have no tall trees nearby. 

Thoughts?  Ideas?  I welcome your feedback. 

73,

Ed NI6S 
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: FW: 160m Vertical Ideas?, Ian Fugler <=